πŸ“š (Please don’t spoil me) Me reading Gideon the Ninth: KISS! KISS! KISS!

Welp. Sitting on hold with the grocery store because they accidentally charged me $78.89 for 1 lb of turkey is not how I expected to spend my Saturday morning, but here we are.

The layers of references in this poster are delightful: cats as Data and Geordi as Holmes and Watson chef kiss πŸ––πŸ“ΊπŸ–ΌοΈ

Finished reading: Wonder Woman: Warbringer by Leigh Bardugo πŸ“š

πŸ’¬πŸ“š “If you cannot bear our pain, you are not fit to carry our strength.” WONDER WOMAN: WARBRINGER, Leigh Bardugo

πŸ“š I’m reading Leigh Bardugo’s WONDER WOMAN: WARBRINGER & while it took a little while to grab me, here at about 2/3 of the way through I’m constantly thinking “WAIT WHAT? AAAHHH!” in a good way. Kinda wish someone would make this a movie.

I’m announcing it to make it real: I’m going to write a sweet romance novella for Camp NaNoWriMo in July & I’m going to write it in public on a blog as an open learning exercise. I’ll post the blog link once I’ve got it set up.

πŸ’¬πŸ“Ί “No one likes having a curse, but if you take the right steps, it’s manageable.” - Eda the Owl Lady, The Owl House Season 1 Episode 4, “The Intruder”

Anybody else feel like a lot of qualitative methodology writeups in studies are basically “I did a qual! I analyzed a thing! DATA! CODES!” and not any detail? No particular study driving this now, just a general sense.